This may be a bit overdramatic, but maybe it is time to look at this paradigm.
It used to be that you needed a degree to work in certain fields, now it is for almost everything. The degree has replaced the high school diploma as the minimum education standard required for most living wage work.
But it has very little to do with actual training for one's chosen field... More and more it matters little what your B. A. was in, only that you have one.
In this way, it really is being treated as diplomas use to be.
When hiring, we used to say that this was because we wanted to see that the potential employee could "finish what they started," and I still agree that there is some merit to that concept. Plus, the development of critical thinking skills that, more and more, happens in college versus high school is another benefit.
But considering the cost of college these days, there is a darker, but huge, benefit for companies that only hire college grads... the immense debt most recent grads are entering the workforce with!
There is so much fear around paying off these loans that people will put up with a lot more than they used to... Low wages and salaries, intolerable and invasive corporate policies, and the knowledge that most workers are immediately replaceable due to all the out of work college grads out there just waiting for the opportunity to "do something with their degrees" or, even more insidious, grads who are just desperate to start paying off their loans.
Of course, having workers who have to go into virtually life long debt for the privilege of working for your company, mostly doing work that could be completed by any average high school grad?
Priceless.
Fearful employees willing to do anything and put up with anything just to keep ahead of their government debt…
What’s better than this? If you don't look too closely, these companies even come off looking like the good guys, since they are the ones giving us a chance to keep one step ahead of the big bad menace of the government.
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Student Loans and Debt Slavery
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
GOP: Selling the American Dream and Winning Elections
This morning on OPB, the local NPR radio station, they had a brief clip from the president of the Portland State University Republicans...
Her main argument for the GOP and Romney, her main attraction to the GOP, was her perception that the Republicans’ primary ethic was success through hard work. She said that this fit well with her family's worldview, since her parents were immigrants who achieved "the American Dream." She also felt the Republicans were more pro-American, more patriotic.
Of course, “arbeit macht frei” sounds familiar... Where have I heard that before?
So, through all of the noise and clatter, what she is taking from the campaigns so far is that the idea of working really hard to achieve success is a Republican ethic. I suppose, for the Democrats’ ethics, she probably shares Romney’s stated view on 47% of America, though, to be fair, she did not mention the Democrats at all.
This is how the GOP gets so many to vote for them, to vote against their best interests. The message is to work hard, keep doing what you are doing, and we’ll get the government to quit supporting those who aren’t working as hard and to remove those who are standing in your way on the path to success.
Of course, in reality, most GOP policies do nothing to help these folks at all. If anything, especially with the current platform, it harms them and takes away many of their protections. And, likely, a Romney victory would result in these folks paying higher taxes, one way or the other, and students, perhaps even the one interviewed on the radio this morning, no longer being able to attend college due to higher costs and reduced financial aid availability.
I would spend the morning collecting stats and historical trends from Republican Congresses and Presidencies, but lets face it… For voters like this young woman, those stats mean nothing. They had her at "work brings freedom."
To be fair, this sounded like the ideas of someone very young who has not really had any real world experience. I don’t know, but it’s what she sounded like to me.
Now, I have no problem with people who are Republicans because they feel that the specific policies and platforms, economic plans, etc. are right for America. I usually disagree with them, but they have their vote and I have mine.
What bothered me here was that she did not talk about economic plans or specific ideas on solving real issues our country was facing, she spoke only of vague generalities and meaningless, emotional slogans. And, to her, the GOP is the party supporting the American Dream.
Of course, this young woman’s vote was probably never up for grabs this year. Her reasons for being a Republican may be silly, but she is one and it is unlikely that she ever considered voting for Obama this year. Party faithful tend to look for reasons to continue to support their candidate, even through disaterous campaigns, rather than looking for reasons to switch their vote to the other guy.
But this clip still tells me a lot about how this election is going, and how recent elections have gone down.
To me, this is a really clear example of how the two parties different ideas distill down to many people, dripping down through incompetent or biased media sources, through tea party / extremist sloganeering, to arrive, stripped of any meaning or sense, to wash and water the preconceived biases of the ordinary voter who does not spend hours, not even every day, but every election, picking their party and candidate…
What dripped down to this student was that the GOP is the party protecting the American dream. Details on how they are doing this? Not necessary. She trusts the signs.
This election will be decided by 5% of the voters in five or so states. If they have not made up their mind yet, they are probably relying on semi-hysterical and mostly meaningless sound bites on the evening and morning news shows, vague notions bantered about by late night comics, Facebook graphics, and water cooler talking points for their information.
What is distilling down to these people is important. It will decide this election. It is easy to laugh and dismiss people who sound like this student sounded this morning, and that is a huge mistake because whichever candidate does the best job at targeting voters like her, albeit ones who have not made up their minds, will win every time.
Historically, the Republicans have the process down. The Democrats are slowly catching up, but still tend to fall into the trap that they can win on the intelligence and strength of their ideas and that sound bites are petty and worthless. No, they can’t win this way.
It is why so many Democrats were baffled by Romney’s “defeat” of Obama in the first debate. Obama brought the facts, Romney brought the persona, and Romney “won.”
As much as I hate to say it, to win, the Democrats must become masters of the very broken, very evil, sound bite and slogan driven PR machine that removes all thought and depth from their arguments and promises everyone success and happiness and ponies as a reward for voting Democrat.
Unfortunately, for the last twelve years or more, the Democrats seem incapable of actually winning elections. The only times they actually win, including the mid-term congressional elections as well as the presidency, is when the GOP screws up so bad that the voters come crawling back to give the Dems one more chance.
Before the first debate, the widening lead in the polls was not due to the strength of the Democrats’ arguments, but due to the ineptness of the Romney campaign. He seems silly, I am not voting for him! Tax codes? Health care? Foreign policy? Nope. Mitt looked silly. Now that Mitt doesn’t seem so silly, these voters are torn again.
This election will be decided by Leno and Letterman and the like, not even by Fox News or The Daily Show, whose viewers were never really in play to start with. The candidate who wins will be the one who provides the least fuel for the jokes, not by the campaign that offers the best, or, at least, the most coherent, ideas for the future of our country. It is sad and it is why, I can’t see for a long time, calling this blog anything but Democracy In Distress.
Related Posts
- Democracy In Distress: God, Politics, Education, & Evolution: Some recent articles
- Democracy In Distress: The war on women & Santorum’s choice
- Democracy In Distress: Code Speak: Politics, bigotry, & the problem with Santorum
- CNN: GOP 2012 Delegate Score Card
- Democracy In Distress: Obama Mail: Today’s Republican Talking Points
- Democracy In Distress: A dysfunctional system goes Super… And fails.
- Democracy In Distress: WTF!?!?! Tea Party Nation asks businesses to stop hiring as expression of tea party solidarity
- Democracy In Distress: Romney’s plunge towards the debates: Don’t count him out yet
- Democracy In Distress: From The Daily Show… All three parts of the interview with Jonathan Macey
- Democracy In Distress: It’s a Trap! Thoughts on the 1st Obama / Romney Debate
- Democracy In Distress: GOP & 2012: A grab bag of headlines from everyone's favorite dysfunctional family
- Democracy In Distress: Marriage Equality: President Obama & North Carolina
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Tuesday, November 08, 2011
A video by Softbox : Federal Government Deficit & War: What Eats Up 53 Cents Of Every Tax Dollar?
I post this coming from neither a pro nor anti war angle, but when both sides in Washington sit around and start pointing fingers at each other about who caused the deficit and wailing about how their party is not to blame, there is one gorilla in the room everyone tends to ignore...
I'm just saying, you know... The Republicans were in office when we went in. Still, someone should have thought about how we were going to pay for this back in the day...
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
"Counter-recruiting" in high schools. These people piss me off.
like uh, you know....if you want someone to represent critical opposing views to the military please evaluate them for articulation and debating skills. this is just difficult to listen to.I support recruiting in high schools. When I thought the "counter-recruiting" was about discussing other options, even things like Americorps, etc, it sounded fine.
No. It is about talking kids out of joining the military. Grrr.
Counter-Recruiters
Counter-Recruiters · Think Out Loud:
This week, the Portland Public School Board voted to allow "counter-recruiters" at Portland's public high schools. Counter-recruiters represent organizations like American Friends Service Committee and the Military & Draft Counseling Project that provide information about military service and recruitment that is meant to dissuade students from joining the military.
'via Blog this'
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Email from the Obama Campaign: Republicans' Kamikaze Political Strategy
But Senate Republicans want to block it. Not because they have a plan that creates jobs right now -- not one Republican, in Congress or in the presidential race, does. They only have a political plan.
Their strategy is to suffocate the economy for the sake of what they think will be a political victory. They think that the more folks see Washington taking no action to create jobs, the better their chances in the next election. So they're doing everything in their power to make sure nothing gets done.
The full email:
Friend
-- The U.S. Senate is supposed to vote on the American Jobs Act as early as tonight. It's a bill that will put people to work immediately, and it contains proposals that members of both parties have said in the past that they'd support. But Senate Republicans want to block it. Not because they have a plan that creates jobs right now -- not one Republican, in Congress or in the presidential race, does. They only have a political plan. Their strategy is to suffocate the economy for the sake of what they think will be a political victory. They think that the more folks see Washington taking no action to create jobs, the better their chances in the next election. So they're doing everything in their power to make sure nothing gets done. There's still time for principled Republican senators to declare their independence from this kamikaze political strategy. Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, needs to hear what Americans like you think. You can reach his office at (202) 224-2541. Tell him not to let politics get in the way of creating jobs. Will you take three minutes and call now? Then click here to let us know how it went. If Sen. McConnell's office says he won't support the American Jobs Act, ask which parts he doesn't support: -- Making sure that those who served our country can get good jobs at home by providing incentives for businesses to hire unemployed veterans? -- Preventing layoffs of teachers, cops, and firefighters, while supporting the hiring of tens of thousands more? -- Rebuilding our crumbling roads, bridges, railways, and airports with a bipartisan, public-private infrastructure bank? -- Modernizing at least 35,000 public schools in rural and urban areas? -- Providing job training for the unemployed, especially young people who have been hit especially hard? The President has been forceful and clear: Action on jobs is desperately needed, and Congress should pass this bill right away. And he has specifically asked those of us who agree to make sure Republican lawmakers know it. This bill -- and the simple idea that every American who works hard and plays by the rules has a fundamental right to economic security -- is a big part of what we stand for as a campaign and as a movement. There's no good reason for Congress to delay any more -- and if they do, you deserve to know why. Call Sen. McConnell's office. Tell him you're watching, and you expect Republicans in the Senate to do the right thing and move forward on this bill today. Then let us know how it went: http://my.barackobama.com/Call-For-Jobs Thanks, Messina Jim Messina Campaign Manager Obama for America |
Wednesday, October 05, 2011
Neal Stephenson discusses America's"Innovation Starvation"
Found this one via Brad on Facebook. Thanks!
"I worry that our inability to match the achievements of the 1960s space program might be symptomatic of a general failure of our society to get big things done. My parents and grandparents witnessed the creation of the airplane, the automobile, nuclear energy, and the computer to name only a few. Scientists and engineers who came of age during the first half of the 20th century could look forward to building things that would solve age-old problems, transform the landscape, build the economy, and provide jobs for the burgeoning middle class that was the basis for our stable democracy.
The imperative to develop new technologies and implement them on a heroic scale no longer seems like the childish preoccupation of a few nerds with slide rules. It’s the only way for the human race to escape from its current predicaments. Too bad we’ve forgotten how to do it.
“You’re the ones who’ve been slacking off!” proclaims Michael Crow, president of Arizona State University (and one of the other speakers at Future Tense). He refers, of course, to SF writers. The scientists and engineers, he seems to be saying, are ready and looking for things to do. Time for the SF writers to start pulling their weight and supplying big visions that make sense. Hence the Hieroglyph project, an effort to produce an anthology of new SF that will be in some ways a conscious throwback to the practical techno-optimism of the Golden Age.
...
China is frequently cited as a country now executing on Big Stuff, and there’s no doubt they are constructing dams, high-speed rail systems, and rockets at an extraordinary clip. But those are not fundamentally innovative. Their space program, like all other countries’ (including our own), is just parroting work that was done 50 years ago by the Soviets and the Americans. A truly innovative program would involve taking risks (and accepting failures) to pioneer some of the alternative space launch technologies that have been advanced by researchers all over the world during the decades dominated by rockets.
But to grasp just how far our current mindset is from being able to attempt innovation on such a scale, consider the fate of the space shuttle’s external tanks [ETs]. Dwarfing the vehicle itself, the ET was the largest and most prominent feature of the space shuttle as it stood on the pad. It remained attached to the shuttle—or perhaps it makes as much sense to say that the shuttle remained attached to it—long after the two strap-on boosters had fallen away. The ET and the shuttle remained connected all the way out of the atmosphere and into space. Only after the system had attained orbital velocity was the tank jettisoned and allowed to fall into the atmosphere, where it was destroyed on re-entry.
At a modest marginal cost, the ETs could have been kept in orbit indefinitely. The mass of the ET at separation, including residual propellants, was about twice that of the largest possible Shuttle payload. Not destroying them would have roughly tripled the total mass launched into orbit by the Shuttle. ETs could have been connected to build units that would have humbled today’s International Space Station. The residual oxygen and hydrogen sloshing around in them could have been combined to generate electricity and produce tons of water, a commodity that is vastly expensive and desirable in space. But in spite of hard work and passionate advocacy by space experts who wished to see the tanks put to use, NASA—for reasons both technical and political—sent each of them to fiery destruction in the atmosphere. Viewed as a parable, it has much to tell us about the difficulties of innovating in other spheres.
Innovation can’t happen without accepting the risk that it might fail. The vast and radical innovations of the mid-20th century took place in a world that, in retrospect, looks insanely dangerous and unstable. Possible outcomes that the modern mind identifies as serious risks might not have been taken seriously—supposing they were noticed at all—by people habituated to the Depression, the World Wars, and the Cold War, in times when seat belts, antibiotics, and many vaccines did not exist. Competition between the Western democracies and the communist powers obliged the former to push their scientists and engineers to the limits of what they could imagine and supplied a sort of safety net in the event that their initial efforts did not pay off. A grizzled NASA veteran once told me that the Apollo moon landings were communism’s greatest achievement."
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Elizabeth Warren and Class Warfare
Thank You, Elizabeth Warren!: "Progressives take note: THAT is how it is done. THAT is how you fight back hard, and THAT is how you defeat Fox News talking points. And THAT is why Warren has actually moved AHEAD of the Republican incumbent in this race."
'via Blog this'
Friday, September 23, 2011
Left wing propaganda video about evolution
And a good comment on this video from a friend of mine on Facebook:
David Finn I'm afraid that the concepts put forth in this video are just impossible for some minds to conceive. So the real question should be... "Did you ever see a Dogma turn into a cat? Or to translate, " Did you ever see a Dogma give birth to anything but itself? Answer: " It is impossible to think outside a box when the box is in control of your thinking."
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Arctic ice at second-lowest extent since 1979 | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine
I just hope that by talking about this, more and more voters will listen. In a very real sense, what happens next is up to us."
'via Blog this'
Monday, September 19, 2011
5 Things Our Kids Won't Have In School | Cracked.com
Recess, p.e. class, textbooks, summer breaks, Valedictorians and other honors, and failing grades. Some of these, for parents with kids in school these days, well... We've seen the writing on the wall. Others, like the end of summer breaks, I've been hearing about since I was in school twenty years ago and it doesn't seem any closer than it did twenty years ago.
Using tablets and e-readers seems inevitable, but most of the other changes predicted by this writer do not, to me, feel like improvements.
The thing that is really killing us in our district is the budget cuts. Already, the boys have nearly as many weeks with four school days as they do with five, and the district is having to cut five more days because of budget short falls. We'll these dates will be announced when the district finished negotiating the timing with the teacher's union.
And these sorts of cuts are not recent. At the end of the 2004-2005 school year, the Portland School District elementary school sent a survey around asking which staff member to lay off, the librarian, the p.p. teacher or the music teacher. The school was already without a counselor.
At the end of the 2009-2010 school year, Gresham-Barlow S. D. was where Portland was five years earlier.
I don't think summer vacations are going away any time soon. If anything, they are getting longer. But it might be time to look at how all this down time is organized, though having all those long breaks would be murder on working, single parents.
Anyway, this article is not too deep, but it does have some entertaining food for thought...
Going Away Because ...
Four little letters: NCLB.
For those of you who have been out of the school loop for the past decade, those letters stand for "No Child Left Behind," which has, for better or worse, done a serious number on American education. Here's why: In 2001, President Bush and Congress passed a law saying we had to get better at school, specifically reading, language arts, math and science. Fair enough."
And failing grades? I agree and disagree with the concept, much like the writer. As long as we are rewarding our kids for real work, not just being overprotective of their feelings or, even worse, creating a situation where it is possible to keep moving through the system without actually learning anything, which I've heard of happening too, because it is just too difficult to fail a kid or to hold them back for a year.
"Failure makes students feel bad. And nobody wants that, do they?
"You kids write whatever the hell you want on these essays. Mr. Scotch and I don't judge."
"I totally messed up that appendectomy. Next time I'll make sure they don't want a sex change."
No pressure.